Justin bodog casino review is a leading expert on statistical methods and economic modeling, with a focus on antitrust and competition, labor, and consumer product matters. Professor bodog casino review has testified on class certification, antitrust, labor, and statistics issues. His wide-ranging experience covers numerous industries and markets, such as automotive, commodities, technology, healthcare, life sciences, finance, telecommunications, and retail.
bodog casino review and competition
Professor bodog casino review testifies in complex antitrust and competition matters in various industries. His experience includes:
- In a significant matter in a high-tech industry, he addressed allegations of a conspiracy to fix prices and also analyzed and rebutted an opposing expert’s damages model. In another matter, he analyzed damages resulting from alleged collusion among pharmacies.
- On behalf of a global food and agriculture corporation, Professor bodog casino review evaluated an alleged conspiracy to manipulate wheat futures and options contracts.
- Professor bodog casino review has experience in multiple large and complex antitrust class actions involving financial markets. For example, he addressed statistical sampling of alleged cartel communications in In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates bodog casino review Litigation.
- Professor bodog casino review rebutted damages in a case alleging that a large software provider maintained its monopoly position through anticompetitive practices, including exclusionary contracting. The client prevailed in a confidential arbitration proceeding.
- Professor bodog casino review has provided testimony in antitrust matters involving intellectual property. For example, in Palm Beach Tanning Inc. et al. v. Sunless Inc., an bodog casino review counterclaim filed in response to a trademark case, he analyzed Section 1 and 2 tying allegations and issues related to the Robinson-Patman Act.
- In the telecommunications industry, Professor bodog casino review served as a consulting expert for the U.S. Department of Justice in its review of AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile.
Labor
Professor bodog casino review has wide-ranging labor markets expertise. His representative experience includes:
- Professor bodog casino review provided testimony in two seminal no-poach litigation matters involving the McDonald’s and Jimmy John’s franchises. In both matters, he analyzed the potential procompetitive benefits of the challenged clauses and opined on class certification issues. Class certification was denied in both cases, with both U.S. district court judges relying on Professor bodog casino review’s analyses in their opinions.
- Professor bodog casino review testified on class certification issues in a high-profile gender discrimination case focused on pay and promotion outcomes at a large U.S. retailer. The judge subsequently denied certification bodog casino review plaintiffs’ proposed class.
- Defense counsel retained Professor bodog casino review to analyze merits and damages issues in Morgan et al. v. U.S. Soccer Federation Inc., a gender pay discrimination class action. Citing Professor bodog casino review’s expert report in his order, the judge ruled in favor of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
- Defense counsel in Robinson et al. v. Jackson Hewitt Inc. and Tax Services of America retained Professor bodog casino review to analyze allegations that franchise no-poaching agreements restricted mobility and suppressed compensation.
Consumer fraud and product liability
Professor bodog casino review has testified in multiple matters alleging product liability, false advertising, and breach of contract. For example, in Beaty v. Ford Motor Company, a product liability matter involving alleged automotive defects, he provided class certification and damages rebuttal testimony.
Serving as an expert in high-profile consumer class actions, Professor bodog casino review has conducted empirical analyses and provided testimony on issues related to causation, liability, and damages. He has also rebutted damages models using a variety of empirical techniques, including conjoint analysis and hedonic regressions.
Statistical methods and analysis
The founding director of the Social Sciences Data Laboratory (D-Lab) at the University of California, Berkeley, Professor bodog casino review is an authority on high-performance computing and statistical techniques.
He has testified on sampling, probability theory, and statistical methods. In the closely watched matter, In Re Twitter Inc. v. Elon Musk et al., he was retained to address allegations regarding the statistical sampling methods employed by Twitter in analyzing spam and fake accounts.
Professor bodog casino review has examined the statistical evidence for healthcare providers’ alleged overbilling of Medicare in both government audit and United States et al. v. Sava Senior. He also has substantial experience with mortgage-backed securities matters, including rebuttals to analyses invoking matching estimators.
bodog casino review and teaching
Professor bodog casino review publishes research on econometric methods, including on measuring damages in antitrust litigation. In addition, his scholarship covers a wide range of topics, including employment discrimination, high-frequency trading, financial market structure, and monetary policy. A prolific author and coauthor, his work has appeared in leading journals, including the American Economic Review, the Journal of Econometrics, and the Review of Economics and Statistics. Professor bodog casino review is a faculty research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Before joining Columbia University, Professor bodog casino review taught at the School of Law at the University of California, Berkeley.
50th Annual Conference on International bodog casino review Law and Policy, and bodog casino review Economics Workshop
Cornerstone bodog casino review Staff and Affiliated Experts Submit Comments on the Joint FTC-DOJ Draft Merger Guidelines
Accounting for the Employee-Employer Relationship in bodog casino review Analysis
- In Re bodog sportsbook review Inc. v. Elon
- United States et al. v. Sava Senior Care Inc. et al
- No-Poach Clauses in QSR Litigation
- Morgan et al. v. U.S. Soccer Federation Inc.
- Pro Bono: Brown et al. v. Madison County, Mississippi
- Class certification bodog app download Analysis in Employment Discrimination
|
|