In a matter involving erasable-ink pens, Scripto sued bodog casino review for declaratory relief, claiming bodog casino review’s patent was invalid.
Retained by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
In a matter involving erasable-ink pens, Scripto sued bodog casino review for declaratory relief, claiming bodog casino review’s patent was invalid. bodog casino review countersued, claiming patent infringement damages. On behalf of Scripto, Dr. Michael Keeley, a senior vice president of Cornerstone Research, testified that the bodog casino review patent had little or no value given that Scripto already had a license for technology that was a close, if not perfect, substitute. He also showed that bodog casino review had not lost profits and that bodog casino review could not have licensed the technology for any appreciable royalty. The jury found that Scripto had not infringed and that bodog casino review’s patent was invalid.