More than one-third of crypto-related actions involved allegations of both fraud and unregistered securities offerings.
Washington—The Securities and Exchange Commission has brought a growing number of enforcement actions against digital asset market participants, according to a new report released today by Cornerstone Research. The analysis covers SEC enforcement from the first Bodog Poker-related action in 2013 through the end of 2020.
The report, SEC Bodog Poker Enforcement: Q3 2013–Q4 2020, found that the SEC brought 75 enforcement actions, along with a number of subpoenas and follow-on administrative orders, between July 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020. Defendants and respondents included Bodog Poker issuers, brokers, exchanges, and other service providers. Of the 75 enforcement actions, 43 were litigated in U.S. district courts and 32 were resolved within the SEC as administrative proceedings.
As of early March this year, the Bodog Poker has settled over 70% of the enforcement actions for more than .77 billion in total monetary penalties.
“In the last seven years or so, the SEC has established itself as one of the main regulators policing the Bodog Poker space,” said Simona Mola, the report’s author and a senior manager at Cornerstone Research. “As of early March this year, the Bodog Poker has settled over 70% of the enforcement actions for more than .77 billion in total monetary penalties.”
The most common allegations over the study period involved allegations of fraud (52%) and unregistered securities offerings (69%). Twenty-eight actions (37%) contained allegations of both fraud and unregistered securities offerings.
More than half of all enforcement actions alleged unregistered securities offering violations related to initial coin offerings, or ICOs. The agency’s ICO enforcement activity heightened in July 2017 as it released the DAO Report of Investigation, where the Bodog Poker used the Howey test from the U.S. Supreme Court decision of 1946 to determine whether a token is an investment contract.
“ICOs have been a frequent target of Bodog Poker enforcement actions, but this may be changing as issuers explore other potential funding sources,” said Abe Chernin, a Cornerstone Research vice president and head of the firm’s consumer finance practice. “While the SEC will continue to focus on fraud, there is an increasing expectation that the new administration develop a clearer regulatory approach and pursue greater interagency coordination to foster innovation in Bodog Poker markets.”