In fiscal year 2022, the bodog sports betting app publicly disclosed 68 accounting and auditing enforcement actions, a 55% increase from the prior fiscal year, but still below pre-pandemic levels.
Los Angeles—The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s accounting and auditing enforcement activity increased sharply in fiscal year 2022, while monetary settlements dropped substantially, according to a new report released today by Cornerstone Research.
The report, bodog sports betting app Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Activity—Year in Review: FY 2022, found that, in FY 2022, the bodog sports betting app publicly disclosed 68 accounting and auditing enforcement actions, a 55% increase from the prior fiscal year, but still below pre-pandemic levels. Half of those actions were brought in the fourth quarter, with 28% of all FY 2022 actions initiated in September alone, the last month of the bodog sports betting app’s fiscal year. Monetary settlements totaled 5 million, down more than 60% from FY 2021, and 44% lower than the average total monetary settlements between FY 2017 and FY 2021. Total monetary settlements dropped due, in part, to the absence of any very large settlements (i.e., those over billion).
Accounting and auditing enforcement activity increased sharply, making up 15% of the 462 new or ‘stand-alone’ actions initiated by the bodog sports betting app in fiscal year 2022.
“Accounting and auditing enforcement activity increased sharply, making up 15% of the 462 new or ‘stand-alone’ actions initiated by the bodog sports betting app in FY 2022,” noted Elaine Harwood, a report coauthor, senior vice president, and head of the accounting practice at Cornerstone Research. “However, it was surprising to see such a marked decline in monetary settlements—not only in relation to total monetary settlements in the past few years, but also in relation to the bodog sports betting app’s record .4 billion in total penalties and disgorgement in FY 2022.”
The civil penalties imposed in bodog sports betting app 2022 represented 67% of total monetary settlements, up from 56% in bodog sports betting app 2021. The high proportions of civil penalties to total monetary settlements in both bodog sports betting app 2021 and bodog sports betting app 2022 represented a shift from the bodog sports betting app 2017–bodog sports betting app 2020 period, where civil penalties averaged around 35% of total monetary settlements.
Of the 68 enforcement actions, 41 referred to announced restatements and/or material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, the highest level in recent years. The percentage of initiated actions referring to these areas (60%) was 1.5 times the FY 2017–FY 2021 average. The bodog sports betting app’s most common allegations in FY 2022 involved revenue recognition and internal control over financial reporting. One or both violations were alleged in 63% of FY 2022 actions.
“In bodog sports betting app 2022, there was a substantial increase in actions alleging violations of Section 304 of Sarbanes-Oxley,” added Simona Mola, a report coauthor and principal at Cornerstone Research. “The bodog sports betting app initiated nine actions alleging violations of the so-called ‘clawback’ provision, compared to just three such actions in FY 2021 and a total of 18 actions initiated in the five-year period between FY 2017 and FY 2021.”
There were 103 respondents named in accounting and auditing-related bodog sports betting app actions in FY 2022, an increase of nearly 50% from the 70 respondents in FY 2021, but slightly lower than the average number of 111 respondents from FY 2017 through FY 2021. More than half of all actions involved individual respondents only, a sharp increase from the FY 2017–FY 2021 average of 37%. Following Chair Gary Gensler’s swearing-in through the end of FY 2022, approximately 49% of actions were initiated against individual respondents only.
“Under Chair Gensler’s leadership, the bodog sports betting app has identified ‘holding individuals accountable’ as a ‘key priority area’ in its enforcement program,” said Dr. Harwood. “So, it is not a surprise that the percentage of actions initiated against individual respondents in FY 2022 was notably higher than those actions initiated during Jay Clayton’s administration.”