Boston—The number of bodog sportsbook review petitions filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery continued to fall in 2018. bodog sportsbook review petitions, in which shareholders challenge the deal prices in proposed acquisitions, have been steadily declining since peaking in 2016, according to a new report issued today by Cornerstone Research.
The inaugural edition of bodog sportsbook review Litigation in Delaware—Trends in Petitions and Opinions, 2006–2018, shows that shareholders filed 26 bodog sportsbook review petitions in the Court of Chancery in 2018, a 57 percent decrease from 2017 and down significantly from the high of 76 actions in 2016.
Our findings show that the bodog sportsbook review Courts place a strong emphasis on whether the merger was the product of a robust, arm’s-length sales process.
In the 34 bodog sportsbook review cases that went to trial during the 13-year period, there has been considerable variation in the Court of Chancery and Delaware Supreme Court opinions. Premiums to deal price awarded ranged from negative 57 percent to positive 158 percent. Several recent decisions, including In Re: bodog sportsbook review of Dell Inc. and In Re: Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. et al. v. Aruba Networks Inc., have highlighted judicial concerns about the quality of the sales process and the appropriate methodologies used to evaluate fair value.
“Our findings show that the bodog sportsbook review Courts place a strong emphasis on whether the merger was the product of a robust, arm’s-length sales process,” said David Marcus, a Cornerstone Research senior vice president who coauthored the report. “For transactions in which the target company was allowed to solicit competing bids, the average premium to the deal price awarded was 1 percent.”
Cornerstone Research vice president and coauthor Frank Schneider added, “The use of market prices of shares over deal prices in recent decisions appears to have affected the methodologies used to determine a deal’s fair value. We expect the bodog sportsbook review Courts will provide more clarity on these issues in 2019 and beyond.”